The signalling cascade from initial stimulus to downstream effector — and where therapeutic intervention is possible at each node.
Upstream blockade vs downstream blockade — understanding the distinction is critical for treatment selection and sequencing.
The downstream disease manifestations of dysregulated signalling in this pathway.
Clinically actionable insights for treatment selection and sequencing
Upstream vs downstream: choose IL-23 blockers when sustained remission and less frequent dosing is the priority; IL-17 blockers when speed of response matters most.
IBD caution: avoid IL-17 blockers (secukinumab, ixekizumab, bimekizumab, brodalumab) in patients with active Crohns disease. IL-23 blockers are safe — ustekinumab is licensed for Crohns.
Switching within the axis: if a patient fails an IL-17 blocker, switching to an IL-23 blocker (or vice versa) can be effective — they target different points on the same pathway.
PsA vs AS: IL-17 blockers are effective in both peripheral and axial disease. IL-23 blockers show less consistent efficacy in pure axial disease (AS) — check individual drug licensing.
Guidelines, trials, clinical briefs, podcasts and CPD connected to this pathway.
Get Dermatology Drug Science updates, related trials and education resources in your ClinicaliQ preferences.
Complete the reflective questions and self-assessment to claim your CPD certificate for this molecular mechanism hub.
Go to CPD Centre →